zSecurity
Ethical hacking, OSINT, and AI security tools with a focus on practical exploits and terminal-based tutorials.
Nutrition Label
zSecurity delivers highly authentic, hands-on hacking tutorials that prioritize "show, don't tell" demonstrations using real terminal commands and live environments. While the technical walkthroughs are reliable and sponsorship disclosures are excellent, the video titles frequently exaggerate the scope or severity of the exploits shown, often framing standard OSINT techniques as direct application breaches.
Strengths
- +
- +
- +
Notes
- !Titles often claim direct hacks on secure apps, while content usually demonstrates social engineering or public data scraping.
- !Sponsorships and affiliate tools are transparently integrated into the tutorials, often as required steps for the workflow.
Rating Breakdown
Breakdown across the key dimensions we rate. Methodology →
Recent Videos
I Built an AI Agent That Hacks for Me | OpenClaw + Kali Linux
Access WhatsApp & Gmail of Anyone & Bypass 2FA / MFA 🔓👁️
Run YOUR own UNCENSORED AI & Use it for Hacking
How to Hack Android Phones & Access Messages, Calls & More
Your Anti-Virus Sucks 🚨 How I’d Hack You & How to Stop Me!
How to Jailbreak AI & Use it for Hacking | ChatGPT 5 | Gemini 2.5 Pro | Claude
Track WhatsApp Location + Linked Accounts + Passwords
This Wi-Fi BadUSB Can Hack Your Computer in 3 Seconds
Make Your Own Insanely Fast VPN with No Logs!
Find ANYONE’s Email | GitHub + Google Docs OSINT Hacks!
Google Paid $150K for THIS Bug – Learn How to Find It
Why this rating
Evidence receipts showing why each dimension is rated the way it is.
“I'm going to run a command that will download a docker image... it basically contains a browser that can be accessed through the web.”[08:15] →
Demonstrates the exact terminal commands and configuration steps in real-time, showing the actual workflow rather than just slides.
“Special thanks to: Pliny the Liberator... For publishing all their amazing work and contributing to the community”[Description] →
Exceptionally transparent by explicitly crediting the external researcher (Pliny) who discovered the jailbreak prompts, rather than claiming credit for the discovery.
“As you can see, the target has logged in... and if I go back to my hacker machine... I have full access to the emails.”[23:45] →
Provides a complete proof-of-concept by successfully bypassing 2FA on a real Gmail account during the demonstration.
“Ezequiel Pereira... discovered a bug in the Google internal network... Google paid him $36,000.”[00:25] →
The title claims 'Google Paid $150K', but the specific case study cited in the video explicitly mentions a $36,000 payout, creating a significant clickbait discrepancy.
“The Zero Trust Solution”[6:21] →
The solution presented (Allowlisting/Zero Trust) is a standard industry sales pitch for the sponsored tool, rather than a novel or independent security insight.